Home | Gallery | Forum | Ads Sponsored by Yesterday's Tractors 
The Classic Truck Resource Page
Vintage Truck Headquarters

 
Featured Photo

Marketplace
Classified Ads
Photo Ads

Community
Discussion Forum
Forum Archives

Galleries
Misc Truck Photos
Ford Truck Photos
Picture List

Research & Info
Model Profiles
Ford F-Series
Article Archives
Truck Links

Miscellaneous
Contact Us

Related Sites
Antique Tractors
Kountry Life
Tractor Parts
Tractor Manuals

[Home]
Classic Truck Discussion Board

Re: Re: Truck engine cams vs Car engine cams


[ Expand ] [ View Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Return to Forum ]

Posted by Hal/WA on October 04, 2007 at 18:08:57 from (66.45.175.118):

In Reply to: Re: Truck engine cams vs Car engine cams posted by Bob on October 04, 2007 at 07:59:23:

Great advice. During the early anti-emission years, the camshafts were really lousy, and often the timing sets were changed to retard the camshaft. Retarding the camshaft supposedly lessened some emissions, but ruined the power and economy.

The custom cam grinders have many different cams depending on what a given engine is going into and what job the combination will be asked to do. They will ask the vehicle weight and type, the transmission and converter, the rear end ratio and tire size, the other specifications and modifications to the engine, and how you plan to use the truck, as well as a number of other questions. Once they have all the information, they can make a recommendation of what cam to use.

I don't know if a 74 half ton 302 would have a different cam than a car 302 of the same year. But it was really remarkable how different some of the FE engines ran a few years before, depending on if they came in a pickup or a car. A friend of mine had a 66 F100 that came with a 352 2 barrel. It was a real slug and got horrible gas mileage. Eventually the 352 got tired and they decided to put in a 390 2 barrel from their recently wrecked 69 Country Squire station wagon. It was a strictly bolt in swap and used the exhaust manifolds from the 352. The pickup with the 390 felt like it had about twice the power as with the 352 and the fuel economy went clear up to 12mpg from around 8. Neither engine required premium gas, so there must not have been a huge difference in compression ratio with the 390.

Good luck with your 302. They can be made to run strong and economically.


Follow Ups:




Post A Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject: Re: Re: Re: Truck engine cams vs Car engine cams

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

Email Notification: If you check this box, email will be sent to you whenever someone replies to this message. Your email address must be entered above to receive notification. This notification will be cancelled automatically after 2 weeks.


[Home]

Copyright © 2002-2010 Yesterday's Tractor Co.
Antique Truck Headquarters
www.YesterdaysTruck.com
Privacy Statement | Terms and Conditions of Use